Scenario 01 · Marketing

Always-on brand and competitor intelligence

Most teams run competitor intelligence as a Monday scramble: someone opens the same set of tabs, skims what changed, and pastes fragments into a chat thread. An agent replaces the scramble with a nightly sweep that never skips a source, never forgets where it read something, and hands the team a drafted digest before the day starts. Every claim in that digest carries its source link.

The workflow, today and with an agent

Today the work is manual and partial. An analyst checks what there is time to check, and the sources that get skipped are exactly the ones nobody is watching. Coverage depends on who is in the office and what else landed that week.

With an agent, the sweep runs every night against a curated list. The team decides what matters; the agent does the walking.

The agent drafts a digest, flags what moved since the previous sweep, and delivers it to the team WhatsApp before 9am. Anything that did not change is noted as unchanged, not repeated.

The core discipline Every claim carries its source link. If the digest says a competitor cut a price, the line links to the page where the price was read. The team never has to take the agent's word for anything.

How it is built, in plain words

There is no exotic machinery here. The build is five parts, and only one of them is software the team has not seen before.

A realistic weekly rhythm

Cadence What runs Who acts
Nightly Full sweep of the source list; changes logged against the previous sweep Agent only; run is logged
Each morning Drafted digest with flags on what moved, delivered before 9am Editor reviews, trims, releases to the team
Weekly Deep-dive synthesis: what the week's movements add up to Editor leads; agent drafts the synthesis
Monthly Source-list review: what to add, retire or reweight Team decision; the agent does not choose its own sources

What changes for the team

The analyst does not disappear. The analyst becomes the editor: the person who decides what the digest says, not the person who gathers what it says. That is a promotion in the work, not a replacement of it.

Coverage changes shape. It goes from "what one person could check" to "everything on the list, nightly". A beverage brand watching a price war no longer finds out about a competitor's move when a distributor mentions it; the move is in the morning digest with a link. A QSR chain tracking delivery promotions sees every platform listing change overnight, not the ones someone happened to open.

The judgment work is untouched and becomes more valuable. "So what" and "so now what" are still human questions. The difference is that the human answering them starts from a complete picture instead of a partial one, and spends the morning on the answer rather than the gathering.

Governance notes for this scenario

This scenario is deliberately low-risk, which is why it makes a good first deployment. The controls are simple and absolute.

On cost The costs here are volume work, and they are shaped accordingly. A budget model does the nightly sweeping, which is high-volume reading with low judgment. A frontier model writes the weekly synthesis, which is low-volume and judgment-heavy. Paying frontier rates for page-reading is the most common way this pattern gets needlessly expensive.

BASIC · Agentic AI Workshop · aiagent.research.my